1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 66 A.D.3d
  5. 66 A.D.3d 647 (2009)
 

MADIREDDY v. MADIREDDY

2008-07477.

66 A.D.3d 647 (2009)

886 N.Y.S.2d 495

2009 NY Slip Op 7232

RUKMINAMMA MADIREDDY, Respondent, v. SUBBA REDDY MADIREDDY, Also Known as SUBBA A. REDDY, Appellant, and CHITTEMMA REDDY, Intervenor-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 6, 2009.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant correctly contends that a determination as to whether he and the plaintiff were married in a valid Hindu ceremony in India in 1952 improperly involves the court in a religious matter. Such a determination cannot be made on the basis of neutral principles of law. "The `neutral principles of law' approach requires...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases