OPPENHEIM v. MOJO-STUMER ASSOC. ARCHITECTS, P.C.

No. 602408/06, Motion Seq. No. 009.

2009 NY Slip Op 32141 (U)

AVIVITH OPPENHEIM and WILLIAM OPPENHEIM, Plaintiffs v. MOJO-STUMER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.C. d/b/a MOJO-STUMER ASSOCIATES, P.C, MARK STUMER and JOSEPH VISCUSO, Defendants.

Supreme Court, New York County.

September 15, 2009.


CHARLES E. RAMOS, Judge.

In motion sequence 009, the plaintiffs Avivith Oppenheim and William Oppenheim (the "Oppenheims") move pursuant to CPLR 3025(b) to amend their second amended complaint to: (1) add a RICO cause of action based on alleged mail and wire fraud under 18 USC 1346, (2) include Mark Stumer in the fifth cause of action for negligence and malpractice, (3) increase the ad damnum amount from $501,000 to $2,500,000, and (4) substitute "MSA" as the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases