Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the statute of frauds is not a bar to the plaintiff's action, albeit on grounds somewhat different from those stated by the Supreme Court. The plaintiff's claim that she had an oral employment agreement with the defendant is not subject to the provisions of General Obligations Law § 5-701 (a) (10) (see Caruso v Malang,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.