CABRERA v. NEW YORK UNIV. COLL.


25 Misc.3d 51 (2009)

PEDRO CABRERA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

Decided September 11, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones Hirsch Connors & Bull P.C., New York City, for appellant.

Kerner & Kerner, New York City, for respondent.

SCHOENFELD and HEITLER, JJ., concur; McKEON, P.J., concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Orders, entered April 24, 2008, and June 17, 2008, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs.

Civil Court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff leave to renew based upon the affirmation of plaintiff's attorney explaining why his medical expert's affirmation was unsigned and redacted (see Mattis v Keen, Zhao, 54 A.D.3d 610

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases