OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
Orders, entered April 24, 2008, and June 17, 2008, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs.
Civil Court properly exercised its discretion in granting plaintiff leave to renew based upon the affirmation of plaintiff's attorney explaining why his medical expert's affirmation was unsigned and redacted (see Mattis v Keen, Zhao,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.