D'ESPOSITO v. KUNG

2008-04804.

2009 NY Slip Op 06399

CAROL D'ESPOSITO, respondent, v. JOHN S. KUNG, ET AL., appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided September 8, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clausen Miller, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Edward L. Soyka of counsel), for appellants John S. Kung and Staten Island Ophthalmology, P.C.

Gordon & Silber, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael J. Laub and Andrew B. Kaufman of counsel), for appellant Zinovy Beider.

Meiselman & Gordon, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Ava M. Gordon of counsel), for respondent.

Before: William F. Mastro, J.P., Randall T. Eng, Ariel E. Belen, L. Priscilla Hall, JJ.


DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants John S. Kung and Staten Island Ophthalmology, P.C., and the defendant Zinovy Beider, separately established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law through the submission of expert affidavits and deposition testimony (see Alvarez v Prospect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases