MOSTEL v. PETRYCKI

102514/09

25 Misc.3d 929 (2009)

885 N.Y.S.2d 397

2009 NY Slip Op 29363

BENNET MOSTEL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL C. PETRYCKI, Defendant.

Supreme Court, New York County.

Decided September 2, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, New York City (Martin J. Schwartz of counsel), for defendant.

Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, New York City (Scott M. Kessler of counsel), for plaintiff.


OPINION OF THE COURT

EDWARD H. LEHNER, J.

Before the court is a motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), (7) and 3016 (b). Plaintiff's complaint asserts five causes of action. Four are based on an asserted fraudulent conveyance pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law §§ 273, 273-a, 276 and 276-a. A fifth cause of action is premised on a claim of unjust enrichment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases