1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 65 A.D.3d
  5. 65 A.D.3d 882 (2009)
 

DOBROSHI v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

65 A.D.3d 882 (2009)

886 N.Y.S.2d 106

ZANA DOBROSHI, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 8, 2009.

Contrary to defendant's claim, the second cause of action pleads fraud with sufficient particularity to satisfy CPLR 3016 (b) (see Lanzi v Brooks, 43 N.Y.2d 778, 780 [1977]). It informs defendant that plaintiff complains of the significant increase in settlement costs between the good faith estimate of settlement services (GFE) and the HUD-1 statement, and of the fact that she was informed about this increase only one day before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases