1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 65 A.D.3d
  5. 65 A.D.3d 861 (2009)
 

MINIERO v. CITY OF NEW YORK

65 A.D.3d 861 (2009)

885 N.Y.S.2d 45

EUGENE MINIERO et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants. JAMES CARROLL et al., Respondents, v. MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES COMPANY, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 1, 2009.

As we held in Casson v City of New York (269 A.D.2d 285 [2000], lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 756 [2000]), claims of injuries like those alleged by plaintiffs, which, according to their own expert, can manifest themselves immediately upon exposure to high sound levels, are governed not by the exceptional accrual rules applicable to toxic torts (CPLR 214-c) and repetitive stress injuries (see Blanco v American Tel. & Tel. Co....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases