This action stems from injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff on July 6, 2004, while being removed by two Cambridge security guards from a disabled elevator in a building owned and managed by Stevenson. The elevator was regularly maintained by Mainco pursuant to a contract between it and Stevenson.
Mainco's substantial control over maintenance of the elevator was sufficient to support an inference of negligence on its part (see Rogers v Dorchester Assoc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.