At the time Thomas A. Doyle sold the sculpture in question to defendant Universe Antiques, on December 21 or 22, 2004, he had possessed it only for the purpose of its authentication. As such, there was no delivery from plaintiff to him "under a transaction of purchase"; he possessed no "voidable title" under UCC 2-403 (1), and could not pass good title even to subsequent good faith purchasers for value (see Candela v Port Motors,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ALEXANDER v. SPANIERMAN GALLERY, LLC
64 A.D.3d 487 (2009)
883 N.Y.S.2d 492
NORMAN ALEXANDER, Respondent, v. SPANIERMAN GALLERY, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 21, 2009.
Decided July 21, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.