TOUNKARA v. FERNICOLA


63 A.D.3d 648 (2009)

BALLA TOUNKARA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY FERNICOLA et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. CANADIAN ARCTIC BUILDERS CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 30, 2009.


A workers' compensation board judge determined that at the time of the accident, plaintiff was employed not by Canadian Arctic but by nonparty Mt. Moriah. The motion court initially decided that this administrative determination had no collateral estoppel effect on AMF's contractual indemnity claim against Canadian Arctic, and denied Canadian Arctic's motion to dismiss. Subsequently, Canadian Arctic moved to reargue on the ground that the court overlooked evidence, first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases