MEDINA v. CITY OF NEW YORK


63 A.D.3d 632 (2009)

882 N.Y.S.2d 95

DAVID MEDINA, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 30, 2009.


The commencement of this action was untimely (General Municipal Law § 50-i). Plaintiff's objection that defendant's answer should be considered a nullity was effectively waived when he retained that responsive pleading for two months before moving to dismiss (see e.g. Rosenshein v Ernstoff, 176 A.D.2d 686 [1991]). He also failed to offer any evidence that defendant had induced him to delay bringing the action by misleading him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases