Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the resentencing court improperly failed to exercise its sentencing discretion to reconsider the sentence as a whole, in that the court should have considered whether the duration of the terms of imprisonment originally imposed on his conviction of assault in the first degree and burglary in the first degree were still appropriate in light of the fact that periods of postrelease supervision would...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
