BD. OF MGRS. OF THE 195 HUDSON ST. CONDOM. v. 195 HUDSON ST. ASSOC., LLC


63 A.D.3d 523 (2009)

881 N.Y.S.2d 84

BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE 195 HUDSON STREET CONDOMINIUM, Appellant-Respondent, v. 195 HUDSON STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., Defendants, and K&J CONSTRUCTION CO., LP, et al., Respondents-Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 16, 2009.


Plaintiff's argument that the court abused its discretion by precluding their expert from testifying as to future costs is preserved (see CPLR 5501 [a] [3]; Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v City of New York, 58 N.Y.2d 377, 382 [1983]). "Given the lengthy colloquy on the subject, the court obviously was aware of the nature of the objection and, more importantly, it recognized that the issue would be subject to appellate review" (Gallegos...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases