Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The sole contention raised by the plaintiff is that the court committed reversible error by striking one of her answers on cross-examination as nonresponsive. This issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see Doyle v Nusser,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.