Defendants established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a permanent consequential or significant injury, by submitting the affirmations of an orthopedist, neurologist and radiologist who found that the knee and shoulder conditions were degenerative in origin and did not cause significant limitations, that the lumbar spine condition was preexisting, and that there were no limitations in range of motion of the cervical spine (see Valentin v Pomilla,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DEPENA v. SYLLA
63 A.D.3d 504 (2009)
880 N.Y.S.2d 641
DEYSI DEPENA, Respondent-Appellant, v. MOHAMED SYLLA et al., Appellants-Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 11, 2009.
Decided June 11, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
