A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the application court's findings that while defendant continues to suffer from a mental illness, he no longer shows a level of dangerousness warranting retention in a secure facility, and that he otherwise meets the criteria for retention in a nonsecure facility (see Matter of David B.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF RABINOWITZ v. JAMES M.
63 A.D.3d 481 (2009)
879 N.Y.S.2d 715
In the Matter of STEVEN RABINOWITZ, Petitioner, v. JAMES M., Respondent, and THOMAS J. SPOTA, as Suffolk County District Attorney, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 9, 2009.
Decided June 9, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.