1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 63 A.D.3d
  5. 63 A.D.3d 683 (2009)
 

HOM v. KAPLAN

63 A.D.3d 683 (2009)

879 N.Y.S.2d 726

STANLEY HOM et al., Appellants, v. KENNETH KAPLAN et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 2, 2009.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, the defendants Kenneth Kaplan and Lois Kaplan (hereinafter the Kaplans) made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see CPLR 6511 [b]; Nassau County Administrative Code §§ 19-14.0, 19-16.0, 19-18.0 [L 1939, chs 272, 701-709, as amended]; O'Neill v Lola Realty Corp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases