McMAHAN v. McMAHAN


62 A.D.3d 619 (2009)

879 N.Y.S.2d 448

ELENA McMAHAN, Respondent, v. BRUCE McMAHAN, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 28, 2009.


As against appellant, the action should not have been discontinued without prejudice where plaintiff's notice of discontinuance was untimely under CPLR 3217 (a) (see Citidress II Corp. v Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, 59 A.D.3d 210, 211 [2009]), and was apparently served in order to avoid an adverse decision on a pending motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice and to enable plaintiff to raise the claims she makes herein in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases