PEOPLE v. HOGUE


62 A.D.3d 410 (2009)

878 N.Y.S.2d 318

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HOGUE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 5, 2009.


Although defendant's conviction required the imposition of a term of post-release supervision (PRS), the court did not mention PRS during the plea allocution (see People v Catu, 4 N.Y.3d 242 [2005]), and failed to impose any term of PRS at sentencing, either orally or otherwise (see People v Sparber, 10 N.Y.3d 457 [2008]). However, defendant did not raise any issue relating to PRS on his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases