MARSH v. CITY OF NEW YORK


61 A.D.3d 552 (2009)

877 N.Y.S.2d 65

JAMES MARSH, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants, and MELIDO CABRERA et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 21, 2009.


Defendants met their burden of establishing lack of causation by their expert's opinion that plaintiff's injuries were degenerative. The only opinion on causation submitted by plaintiff that was based on admissible evidence, that of his treating chiropractor, failed to address appellants' nonconclusory expert opinion that plaintiff's allegedly permanent cervical and lumbar conditions are degenerative in nature (see Valentin v Pomilla, 59 A.D.3d 184...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases