Plaintiff's original error in serving notices of claim on the Town of Carmel and Putnam County is excusable, based as it was on a reasonable belief that one or the other owned this roadway within the territorial jurisdiction of both, and plaintiff's subsequent delay in serving the true owner, the City of New York, is also excusable where he promptly moved to serve a late notice of claim against the City once advised by Putnam County that the site is owned by the City (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KOBERNIK v. CITY OF NEW YORK
61 A.D.3d 483 (2009)
877 N.Y.S.2d 46
ALEXANDER KOBERNIK, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 14, 2009.
Decided April 14, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
