1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 61 A.D.3d
  5. 61 A.D.3d 634 (2009)
 

GUHA v. GUHA

61 A.D.3d 634 (2009)

877 N.Y.S.2d 151

ANAMIKA ROY GUHA, Respondent, v. STEVEN GUHA, Also Known as SUBRATA GUHA, Also Known as SHONE GUHA, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 7, 2009.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in awarding him only 30% of the value of the marital residence and 5% of the value of the plaintiff's enhanced earning capacity. "Equitable distribution does not necessarily mean equal distribution" (Evans v Evans, 57 A.D.3d 718, 719 [2008]; see Groesbeck v Groesbeck,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases