1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 61 A.D.3d
  5. 61 A.D.3d 430 (2009)
 

CANGRO v. MARANGOS

61 A.D.3d 430 (2009)

876 N.Y.S.2d 396

JENNIFER CANGRO, Appellant, v. JOHN Z. MARANGOS, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 7, 2009.

The allegations in the complaint and in plaintiff's affidavit constitute "bare legal conclusions" (see Caniglia v Chicago Tribune-N.Y. News Syndicate, 204 A.D.2d 233, 233-234 [1994]). Plaintiff's fraud claims are not pleaded with the requisite particularity (CPLR 3016 [b]). Her defamation claims fail because the alleged offending statements were made in the context of a judicial proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases