1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 60 A.D.3d
  5. 60 A.D.3d 918 (2009)
 

McFARLANE v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

60 A.D.3d 918 (2009)

875 N.Y.S.2d 581

ANTONETTE T. McFARLANE, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 24, 2009.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants' contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its broad discretion in denying their motion to compel the plaintiff to furnish the requested authorizations for certain medical records (see generally Gilman & Ciocia, Inc. v Walsh, 45 A.D.3d 531 [2007]; Walsh v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 289 A.D.2d 842

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases