1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 60 A.D.3d
  5. 60 A.D.3d 556 (2009)
 

CROWLEY v. RUDERMAN

60 A.D.3d 556 (2009)

___ N.Y.S.2d ___

CATHERINE CROWLEY, Respondent, v. DANIEL RUDERMAN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 26, 2009.

The trial court's rejection of defendant's expert's testimony as to the value of the marital residence is entitled to substantial deference (see Hale v Hale, 16 A.D.3d 231, 233 [2005]). Most significantly, in contrast to the work done by plaintiff's expert in reaching his conclusion, defendant's expert did not visit comparable apartments or view photographs of them, was unaware of the extent or cost of the bathroom and kitchen renovations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases