Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The hearing court correctly determined that the People met their burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the defendant's designation as a level two sex offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court properly assessed 15 points for the "drug or alcohol abuse" risk factor, based on his admission that he was abusing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
