Defendants satisfied their prima facie burden of showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Based on their physical examinations of plaintiff and review of her MRI reports, as well as plaintiff's own statements, defendants' experts concluded that any limitations were either degenerative in nature or attributable to a workplace accident subsequent to the instant occurrence (see Valentin v Pomilla,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROSE v. CITYWIDE AUTO LEASING, INC.
60 A.D.3d 520 (2009)
875 N.Y.S.2d 471
LISA ROSE, Respondent, v. CITYWIDE AUTO LEASING, INC., Defendant, and IBRAHIMA Sow et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 19, 2009.
Decided March 19, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
