On their motion, inter alia, in effect, to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a), the defendants were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default in opposing the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissing their counterclaim, as well as a meritorious defense to the plaintiff's complaint and a meritorious counterclaim (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PAPE v. DAINO
60 A.D.3d 654 (2009)
874 N.Y.S.2d 567
CHRISTOPHER PAPE, Respondent, v. FABIO D. DAINO et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 3, 2009.
Decided March 3, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
