Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People's expert in surgery and trauma should not have been permitted to testify that, in his opinion, the complainant's injuries could not have been self-inflicted is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to object to the testimony with specificity (see People v Hawkins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.