Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in admitting a copy of his passport into evidence. The passport evidence was properly admitted for the relevant, nonhearsay purposes of establishing the reasons for the testifying police officer's actions and explaining the events which precipitated the defendant's arrest (see generally People v Smalls,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HOLMES
59 A.D.3d 462 (2009)
873 N.Y.S.2d 153
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. REGINALD HOLMES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 3, 2009.
Decided February 3, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
