GONZALEZ v. KAYE


58 A.D.3d 578 (2009)

872 N.Y.S.2d 443

DANIEL GONZALEZ, Respondent, v. EUGENIA KAYE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

January 29, 2009.


Defendant claims no prejudice arising from the discontinuance of the action (see Burnham Serv. Corp. v National Council on Compensation Ins., 288 A.D.2d 31, 32-33 [2001]). She contends that plaintiff sought the discontinuance to avoid an adverse determination on defendant's motion for summary judgment (see e.g. Matter of Baltia Air Lines v CIBC Oppenheimer Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases