Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and his post-arrest statements to law enforcement officials, as the evidence presented by the People demonstrated that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant (see CPL 140.10 [1] [b]; People v Bigelow,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.