Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court properly permitted the complainant to testify that immediately after the defendant and his companions robbed him at gunpoint, the complainant observed the defendant and his companions rob other passengers in the same subway car. Such testimony established the complainant's ability to identify the defendant as one of the individuals who robbed him (see People v Gines,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.