Supreme Court properly used the lodestar method in determining the reasonable value of plaintiffs' attorneys' services in instituting and settling this class action, rather than applying a percentage of the value of the settlement, in view of the enormous disparity in result between the two methods (see Goldberger v Integrated Resources, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
NAGER v. TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
57 A.D.3d 389 (2008)
869 N.Y.S.2d 492
ARNOLD H. NAGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants-Respondents, v. TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 23, 2008.
December 23, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.