1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 57 A.D.3d
  5. 57 A.D.3d 387 (2008)
 

VENDURO v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY

57 A.D.3d 387 (2008)

RUTH E. VENDURO, Respondent, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al., Respondents, and ADIRONDACK TRANSIT LINES, INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 23, 2008.

The court found issues of fact as to whether Adirondack was responsible for maintenance of the platform under its agreement with defendant Port Authority, and whether Adirondack met its duty to deposit the passengers in a safe area. Contrary to the court's characterization, the agreement between these parties was a "licensing agreement," not a "lease." Adirondack's status as a licensee, without more, did not give rise to a duty to maintain the gate areas (see Gibbs v Port...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases