AGATE v. HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP


57 A.D.3d 341 (2008)

870 N.Y.S.2d 250

JAMES AGATE, Appellant, v. HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 18, 2008.


We affirm for reasons stated in Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP (___ AD3d ___, 2008 NY Slip Op 09934 [2008] [decided herewith]), namely, the failure to demonstrate any legal basis upon which a trier of fact might find that the alleged omission of defendants to present further expert testimony concerning plaintiffs' damages would have resulted in a higher award by the arbitration panel. Thus, since plaintiff cannot establish that, but for the alleged negligence of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases