Defendants produced a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its termination of plaintiff, to wit, a work force reduction during which associates in plaintiff's hiring class were either promoted or reduced according to each area's needs. In response, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the reasons offered for his termination were merely pretextual (see Jordan v Bates Adv. Holdings, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
NANDE v. JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY
57 A.D.3d 318 (2008)
869 N.Y.S.2d 83
GERMAN NANDE, Also Known as GERMAN NANDE PUGA, Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 16, 2008.
December 16, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
