The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting testimony regarding the contents of a 911 call. There was no violation of defendant's right of confrontation, because the evidence was not offered for its truth (see Tennessee v Street,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BARNES
57 A.D.3d 289 (2008)
868 N.Y.S.2d 663
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY BARNES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 11, 2008.
December 11, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.