1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 56 A.D.3d
  5. 56 A.D.3d 800 (2008)
 

PEOPLE v. MEEKS

56 A.D.3d 800 (2008)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RADCLIFFE MEEKS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 25, 2008.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in modifying its Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371, 375 [1974]) to allow the prosecution to cross-examine the defendant about the underlying facts of his prior convictions. The defendant opened the door to such questioning by testifying to facts which conflicted with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases