1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 56 A.D.3d
  5. 56 A.D.3d 1078 (2008)
 

ADAMSKI v. ROMANO-SCHULMAN

56 A.D.3d 1078 (2008)

867 N.Y.S.2d 356

A.J. ADAMSKI, Appellant, v. MELISSA ROMANO-SCHULMAN et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

November 26, 2008.

Mercure, J.P.

The underlying facts are more fully set forth in plaintiff's legal malpractice action (Adamski v Lama, 56 A.D.3d 1071 [2008] [decided herewith]). In this action, plaintiff asserts claims of libel, perjury, fraud in the inducement, tampering with documents, obstruction of justice, and frivolous pleadings against trial counsel for the defendants in Adamski v Lama. Supreme Court granted defendants' motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases