The arbitrator's refusal to address petitioner's state law defenses to charges 9 and 10, based on his mistaken belief that he lacked jurisdiction, does not deprive the award of finality and definiteness (CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]; see Matter of Meisels v Uhr,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF WABST v. SCOPPETTA
56 A.D.3d 399 (2008)
867 N.Y.S.2d 332
In the Matter of WARREN WABST, Appellant, v. NICHOLAS SCOPPETTA, as Commissioner of the New York City Fire Department, et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 25, 2008.
November 25, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.