The motion court properly determined that plaintiff tenant did not timely exercise the exclusive right to purchase his apartment under the August 1999 offering plan, and that plaintiff's "acceptance" to purchase submitted in June 2004 was materially defective in that it failed to comport with the offering plan's acceptance requirements of an executed purchase agreement accompanied by a 10% down payment. Furthermore, under the clear terms of the offering plan, a submitted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
