Memorandum:
We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We add only that the fifth cause of action was properly dismissed for the additional reason that only two of the remaining plaintiffs own property affected by the violation of the local zoning law alleged in that cause of action and, pursuant to Town Law § 268 (2), three or more aggrieved taxpayers are required to assert such a cause of action. We further note that plaintiffs lack standing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
