Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [1]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in admitting in evidence the replacement cost of one of the laptop computers allegedly stolen by defendant because there was evidence from which the jury could discern the market value of the laptop computer (see generally § 155.20 [1]). We reject...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
