1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 56 A.D.3d
  5. 56 A.D.3d 187 (2008)
 

SINGH v. SUKHRAM

56 A.D.3d 187 (2008)

866 N.Y.S.2d 267

NOHAR SINGH, Respondent, v. SAHADEO SUKHRAM, Defendant, and FRANK SINGH et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 21, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chand Y Gresio, LLP, Richmond Hill (Richard Gresio of counsel), for appellant Frank Singh (joining in the brief of appellant Buddy D. Ramsaran).

Narain Law Firm, P.C., South Ozone Park (Nishani D. Naidoo of counsel), for appellant Buddy D. Ramsaran.

McBreen & Kopko, Jericho (Norman N. Bluth, Richard A. Auerbach and Regina M. Vakser of counsel), for respondent.

SKELOS, J.P., DILLON AND LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CHAMBERS, J.

At issue here is whether the Noerr-Pennington doctrine derived from Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. (365 U.S. 127 [1961]) and Mine Workers v Pennington (381 U.S. 657 [1965]), which provides First Amendment protections for persons petitioning the government for redress, applies to a cause of action sounding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases