NATHEL v. NATHEL


55 A.D.3d 434 (2008)

866 N.Y.S.2d 153

ANN MARIE NATHEL, Appellant, v. SHELDON NATHEL, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 23, 2008.


In light of plaintiff's two-year delay in seeking to take defendant's deposition and the imminence of trial, the referee did not improvidently exercise her discretion in limiting the scope and duration of defendant's deposition (CPLR 3103 [a]; Kingsgate Assoc. v Advest, Inc., 208 A.D.2d 356 [1994]).

The referee properly exercised her discretion in denying plaintiff's application to preclude defendant from introducing

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases