CARUSO v. VALENTIN

2007-11366

2008 NY Slip Op 07204

LOUIS CARUSO, respondent, v. JOHN VALENTIN, A/K/A JUAN VALENTIN, ET AL., appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided September 30, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Dashefsky, Smithtown, N.Y., for appellants.

Law Offices of John T. Patafio, P.C., Amityville, N.Y. (Russell Mauro of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peter B. Skelos, J.P., David S. Ritter, Mark C. Dillon, Edward D. Carni, John M. Leventhal, JJ.


DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the defendants' motion which was to vacate the judgment entered upon their failure to appear or answer pursuant to CPLR 5015 since they failed to present a reasonable excuse for their default or to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases