By failing to object, by objecting on a different ground than the one raised on appeal, or by failing to request any further relief after his objections were sustained, defendant failed to preserve any of his present challenges to the prosecutor's opening statement and summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits (see People v Overlee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. AUTAR
54 A.D.3d 609 (2008)
864 N.Y.S.2d 407
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PRABOODIYA AUTAR, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 18, 2008.
September 18, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.