1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 54 A.D.3d
  5. 54 A.D.3d 605 (2008)
 

JINDAL v. JINDAL

54 A.D.3d 605 (2008)

863 N.Y.S.2d 5

MANEESHA JINDAL, Respondent, v. SANJAY JINDAL, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 18, 2008.

The durational residency requirement set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 230 (5) is satisfied by evidence that for two years prior to commencement of the action, plaintiff, although spending a portion of the statutorily relevant period in India, maintained a permanent residence in New York and returned there with regularity (see Weslock v Weslock, 280 A.D.2d 278 [2001], lv dismissed 96 N.Y.2d 824 [2001]; Wildenstein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases